🌀AI Dejima

AI Dejima

__BELOW_IS_AI_GENERATED__

1: Digest of notes

Granting full access to an AI carries risks. As a solution, the concept of an "AI Dejima" has been proposed. This would explicitly restrict access to the AI and allow interaction with the AI only within the limits of that access. Specifically, data related to a particular project would be exported separately and placed in a de-island.

2: Relation to Fragment X

The fragment "AI Dejima" is directly related to the note. The note discusses the risks of granting full access to AI and the concept of "AI Dejima" as a solution. The fragment explains in detail what exactly this "AI Dejima" is, along with its historical background.

3: Deep thinking

The concept of "AI Dejima" has the potential to redefine the AI-human relationship, providing a new framework for maximizing AI capabilities while mitigating the risks of granting AI full access. It provides a new perspective for maximizing AI-human interaction.

4: Thought Summary and Title

AI Dejima" provides a new framework for maximizing AI-human interaction.

Title: "AI Dejima" - A New Framework for Maximizing AI-Human Interaction

extra info

generated: 2023-09-04 17:46

__BELOW_IS_AI_GENERATED__

We discussed removing the 🤖 mark from the title of AI-generated pages and felt that it was natural for humans to respond to AI-generated content. However, we questioned the fact that the content was not subject to being read by the AI. We also discussed the lack of assumption of a collaborative editing forum.

Relevance

This note is related to a fragment of Nishio's research note, "Buried at the Bottom of the AI Page" The idea that it is natural for humans to respond to AI-generated pages and the problem of human thoughts being buried at the bottom of AI-generated pages are, in terms of information transfer between AI and humans closely related.

deep thinking

The issue of information transfer between AI and humans leads to the larger question of how to set the premise for AI-human collaboration: the original idea of preventing AI from reading what it generates was predicated on the unidirectional nature of information transfer between AI and humans. However, the observation that it is natural for humans to react to what AI generates provides a new perspective that information transfer between AI and humans should be bidirectional.

summary of thoughts

Information transfer between AI and humans should be bidirectional.

"AI and Human Information Transfer: The Need for Bidirectionality."

extra info

generated: 2023-09-05 07:13

__BELOW_IS_AI_GENERATED__

1: Digest of notes

The concept of an "AI Dejima" is proposed to address the risks associated with full access to AI. This would take the form of restricting access to AI and exporting data related to specific projects separately.

2: Relation to Fragment

The fragment "🤖🔁AI Dejima" is directly related to the note. The fragment provides a detailed description and historical context for the concept of "AI Dejima" and its risks as discussed in the note.

3: Deep thinking

The concept of "AI Dejima" has the potential to redefine the relationship between AI and humans. It provides a new framework for leveraging the full potential of AI while mitigating its risks.

4: Thought Summary and Title

AI Dejima" offers a new perspective on maximizing AI-human interaction.

Title: "AI Dejima" - A New Perspective on Maximizing AI-Human Interaction

extra info

generated: 2023-10-01 07:09

---